|
ACUMEN:
Ultimately, from a product standpoint, what turned the tide and caused you to select OpenAccounts?
Mr. Linde:
It was clear to us that OpenAccounts was designed for the needs of
mid-sized to large enterprises.
Certainly it offers the robust functionality and scalability needed in companies like ours,
but we were also taken by a user interface that I would call "elegantly simple".
In other words, OpenAccounts obviously put a great deal of thought into design and navigation
from a users perspective... the screens are not overly busy,
the processes are logically grouped and clear.
We were also drawn to the architecture chosen for the product.
Progress is a robust and low maintenance relational database.
One of our criteria for selection was that we could avoid hiring a database administrator.
Progress gave us that freedom.
We also think that the way OpenAccounts uses the Progress environment adds to its
long-term viability as an application.
In other words, they reach down into the Progress tool set and use it to its fullest extent.
ACUMEN: Anything else?
Mr. Linde:
When we began looking for a solution we wanted to be certain that the developer we selected
had a strategy to utilize the web.
It became clear to us the OpenAccounts had thought that through, they had a Web strategy
and target release dates.
That was another indication that we could rely on the application for
a five to seven year timeframe.
ACUMEN:
What one thing would you point to as a differentiator in the OpenAccounts product?
Mr. Linde:
One of the items most appealing to us is the flexibility that they have built into the product
with the cost and expense code structures.
Susquehanna is about to implement a "reporting" company that will gather all of the
general ledger accounts from all of its corporate entities into one corporate tax
and accounting datamart.
One of the greatest challenges behind corporate accounting at Susquehanna Pfaltzgraff
is to integrate financial information received from a number of different accounting systems
that are used by their different corporate entities.
These entities are diverse since Susquehanna Pfaltzgraff's subsidiaries operate numerous
radio stations, manufactures earthen dinnerware and operates a direct marketing business.
The flexibility of the OpenAccounts cost and expense code structure will allow SPC
to import all of the accounts from each division.
By utilizing the cost and expense code structure, SPC can import all of the general ledger
account balances from each SPC division using that division's chart of accounts.
Then, the accounting and tax staff can use the drill-down features in OpenAccounts to analyze
each division's financial activity without having to migrate to that entity's accounting system.
In other words, the coding structure offered by OpenAccounts easily accommodates
our diversity and reporting needs.
ACUMEN:
Would you recommend OpenAccounts to other companies?
Mr. Linde:
Of course, particularly multi-faceted and diverse companies like ours.
I would also recommend OpenAccounts if your enterprise system is relatively inflexible
in the financial reporting area.
The OpenLink toolkit (that allows for seamless integration to legacy systems) sets OpenAccounts
apart as a viable best of breed solution, regardless of your industry.
I would also have to say that, if you're using Microsoft Office tools, you'll absolutely love
Executive Desktop Reporting (EDR).
EDR's use of Excel is unique and very practical.
ACUMEN:
Would you say that ACUMEN Corporation lived up to your expectations?
Mr. Linde:
No doubt about it.
We select a new system based 50% on product and 50% on a company's ability to
properly implement the product.
During the selection process we felt the people from ACUMEN really worked hard
to understand our needs and recommend certain courses of action.
We were impressed enough to actually engage them to help us work through some of
our process issues even before we finally agreed to purchase OpenAccounts.
ACUMEN:
Would you recommend that pre-sale engagement to others?
Mr. Linde:
We were committed to making a good decision, and a pre-sale engagement allowed us
to better evaluate the product in our circumstances and also evaluate the people
who would help us install the product.
That few days of working together solidified our feeling that ACUMEN could really
make a difference for SPC during and after the implementation.
By the time we began conference room pilots, the ACUMEN team already knew a great deal
about the nuances of our business.
So if you want the comfort of a working relationship even before you commit to the overall project,
a pre-sale engagement is a cost effective way to get started.
ACUMEN:
Were you happy with your project team?
Mr. Linde:
Absolutely. They're all top professionals with certifications to prove it.
Even now when we call ACUMEN to ask a question, it's as if the consultants are
an extension of our team.
They give us an answer in SPC terms.
And trust me, they know OpenAccounts inside and out.
By the way, I've implemented several systems during my career.
My experience tells me that many professional services firms are either
great software implementers or great project managers.
ACUMEN has the whole package.
ACUMEN:
What one thing differentiates ACUMEN Corporation from other consultants and software implementers?
Mr. Linde:
If I were restricted to one thing I would say they are a champion for the process.
In other words, ACUMEN is extremely committed to project success (more than even some users)
and they are willing to push the client when necessary to help insure success.
It might sound cliché, but they take ownership.
I remember ACUMEN CEO Phil Perkins telling me before the project to be prepared for his team
to state their opinion and take corrective action if the project were in jeopardy.
I would go a bit further and say that the project team at ACUMEN is willing to challenge
and be challenged, but that makes for a rewarding and successful implementation and partnership.
|